BikeMaster BTX16-BS Battery

Marsoni

M251S

$87.25

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

BikeMaster BTX16-BS BatteryBikeMaster BTX16 BS Battery This Part Fits: Year Make Model Submodel 1996 2008 Kawasaki VN1500E Vulcan 1500 Classic Base 1999 2001 Kawasaki VN1500G Vulcan 1500 Nomad Base 1999 2005 Kawasaki VN1500J R Vulcan 1500 Drifter Base 2000 2004 Kawasaki VN1500L Vulcan Nomad FI Base 2002 2003 Kawasaki VN1500P Vulcan 1500 Mean Streak Base 2003 2008 Kawasaki VN1600A Vulcan 1600 Classic Base 2004 2008 Kawasaki VN1600B Vulcan 1600 Mean Streak Base 2005 2008 Kawasaki

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your BikeMaster BTX16-BS Battery orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your BikeMaster BTX16-BS Battery ships.

Need Help?
Questions about BikeMaster BTX16-BS Battery, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for BikeMaster BTX16-BS Battery in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I bought these shoes for my husband. He has a very hard time finding quality, comfortable shoes. These shoes are just as comfortable as his New Balance. He uses them as a dress shoe and wears them at least once a week. There was no break in period necessary. They were comfortable right out of the box! The only thing we didn't like was the white sole color. Once I knew he was going to keep them, I used a black sharpie marker to color the soles black. Instant amazing, comfortable dress shoes. They were well worth the cost. If you or your SO needs a comfortable pair of shoes, we highly recommend them.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on September 2, 2025

Verified Purchase

Rmanuel

Pawtucket, US

★★★★★ 1

Paid for new, received used.

Size: 9.5 Wide, Color: Cognac, Size: 9.5 Wide, Color: Cognac

Arrived dirty as if someone whore it for more than a few days. Maybe I was mistaken, but I saw nothing about “previously used” on the Amazon page. Returned it. I would suggest that the company use quality control when it comes to shipping. The shoes seem find otherwise. I ordered 9.5 and it was just a bit tight. If I reorder I will go for size 10.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on June 11, 2026

Verified Purchase

Fletch

West Palm Beach, US

★★★★★ 5

Overall Great.

Size: 10.5 Wide, Color: Black

Great product. Great value. Great style. Overall great.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2026

Verified Purchase

B.J. G

Bozeman, US

★★★★★ 3

Decent Shoes with Misleading Description (Not Leather)

Size: 12 Wide, Color: Black, Size: 12 Wide, Color: Black

I only look for leather when I’m purchasing dress shoes. Under the description “details” on this item it lists the shoe as leather upper and inner lining. A photo shows “genuine Napa leather lining”. If you keep reading (which I have now that I’ve received the shoes) it shows “faux leather” in the small print and that is not “leather”. I run a small leather business and this irks me because it’s clearly false advertising. The details also show the product is made in Brazil but when they arrived today, the shoe tag shows “Made in China” and “Man Made upper and lower”. I don’t hate the shoes. They look nice. What I know is they won’t hold up over time like leather, which is why the description should be accurate and not misleading.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 28, 2026

Verified Purchase

Dominic Castellanos

Chelsea, US

★★★★★ 5

Appearance

Size: 8, Color: Tan

Looks better in person

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026